Fascination About h335 load data 223

Fascination About h335 load data 223

Blog Article

  Then Examine powder concentrations between the scenarios utilizing the exact light-weight.  Then I pick 5 that possibly don't look correct or are plenty of distinctive to People all around them to catch my eye/Mind.  I Test People powder expenses on my scale to insure the desired powder charge remains to be coming out with the powder evaluate.

My knowledge with CFE223 is actually excellent velocity for just a supplied load as compared to other powders, but mediocre precision.

It's only speculation that the cartridge was at first nicely been given by shooters and hunters and would have grown to be popular on its own deserves, but in 1954 the U.S. armed forces officially adopted the seven.62x51mm NATO cartridge that is actually similar to the .

I weigh Test on the scale, one out of every ten I cost with powder by dumping the cost out while in the pan, confirming the demand fat after which you can putting the powder back again in the situation.

I've shot loads of WC844 (armed service reminiscent of H335) and WC846 (navy W748 or BallC2) and haven't experienced the slightest hint of ignition problems.   Poodleshooter

Shew me thy approaches, O LORD: educate me thy paths. "you will find couple of far better cartridges in the world as opposed to 7 x 57mm Mauser"

Setting up Loads must originate from published reloading data, not from World wide web. Not looking to choose on you, you’ll end up getting a lot more precise ammo if you're employed them up and take a look at them by yourself within your rifle.  This includes analyzing the most effective powder with your decided on bullet within your rifle.

Personally, my encounter and viewpoint of The 2 powders has become just about the alternative of yours. CFE 223 will execute improved the longer your barrel is along with the heavier the bullet you employ. My ideas are that CFE 223 is correct within the verge of being too gradual of the powder to even use in 223.

I utilized to use many H-335 in .223. I found the temperature sensitivity with a prairie Pet dog shoot in AZ. I switched to H-322 which seemed to do the job equally as nicely but was a lot more steady. I have now switched to TAC, but X-Terminator was also very good with 40 gr bullets in the .

If the mil-surp stuff ran out within the early 1990's, Hodgdon contracted to have the same powder created. I obtained a lot of the new stuff but didn't know there was a change. Experienced to scale back my extended-standing .223 loads 2 grains.

I in fact don't know anybody personally who's got knowledgeable high outrageous tension with it in .223 and .308 loads. That getting mentioned  -I would prefer to use H335 or W748 for the same sort of load but occasionally they are not obtainable but BLC-(two) is. I believe a Mod like this powder for this use.

go for consistency and accuracy neither powder is temp secure.  accuracy often trumps anything to me

 If okay they return in the case, if not they go during the hopper and I then use the powder measure and scale to recharge Individuals conditions With all the powder charge I want.  No use producing ammo that won't shoot to your pistol/rifle and my capacity.  Some of my fantastic loads absolutely are a ache within the butt to load (1 reason I'm transferring to BLC2 for the vast majority of .223 loads).

I’ve go through excellent items about tac however. I’ve browse it’s superior for lighter bullets? What’s your male’s load data for tac and the 55gr’er. Thanks and sorry, I feel like click here I put up a good deal lol YOU ARE MY ONLY Buddies